A methodological tool for approaching the didactic transposition of the natural sciences in kindergarten school: the case of the “states and properties of matter” in two Greek curricula

AΝGELIKI VELLOPOULOU, KONSTANTINOS RAVANIS

Abstract

The natural sciences teaching objects that are included in curricula do not constitute simplifications of scientific knowledge, but arise as the result of certain “didactic transpositions” that constitute objects of research. In this article we present an approach to Greek kindergarten curricula texts, which was attempted through qualitative text analysis and aimed to define the official teaching proposals regarding the “States and Properties of Matter”. The specific teaching object was selected among others as a discipline representative example. We describe the process of text analysis, the categories that emerged, as well as the possibilities of data interpretation offered by the use of a data presentation table, in conjunction with the aims of the study.

Keywords

Didactic transposition, kindergarten curriculum, qualitative text analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Astolfi, J.-P., Darot, É., Ginsburger-Vogel, Y. & Toussaint, J. (1997). Mots-clés de la didactique des sciences. Repères, définitions, bibliographies (Bruxelles: De Boeck).

Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (London: Taylor & Francis).

Bogdan R. C. & Biklen S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).

Bronckart, J. P. & Plazaola Giger, I. (1998). La transposition didactique. Histoire et perspectives d’une problématique fondatrice. Pratiques, 97/98, 35-58.

Chevallard, Y. (1991). La Transposition Didactique (Paris: La Pensée Sauvage Éditions).

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (1998). A guide to teaching practice (London & New York: Routledge).

Colomb, J. (1999). School knowledge and didactic analysis: A research perspective in comparative didactics. Instructional Science, 27, 53-71.

Dafermou, C. Koulouri, P. & Mpasagianni, Ε. (2006). Guide for Kindergarten teacher. Educational planning – creative learning environments (Athens).

Develay, Μ. (1992). De l’apprentissage à l’enseignement. Pour une épistémologie scolaire (Paris: ESF).

Develay, Μ. (1995). Le sens d’une réflexion épistémologique. In M. Develay (éd.) Savoir scolaires et didactiques des disciplines: une encyclopédie pour aujourd’hui (Paris: ESF), 17-31.

Greek Ministry of Education – Greek Pedagogical Institute, (1991). Activities manual for the Kindergarten – teachers’ guide. Athens.

Greek Ministry of Education – Greek Pedagogical Institute, (2002). Cross-thematic curriculum framework for the Kindergarten and curriculum for activities’ development (Athens).

Johsua, S. (1996). Le concept de transposition didactique n’est-il propre qu’aux mathématiques? In C. Raisky & M. Caillot (éds) Au-delà des didactiques, le didactique. Débats autour de concepts fédérateurs (Bruxelles: De Boeck), 37-59.

Johsua, S. & Dupin, J. J. (1993). Introduction à la didactique des sciences et des mathématiques (Paris: P.U.F).

Koliopoulos, D. & Ravanis, K. (2000). Élaboration et évaluation du contenu conceptuel d’un curriculum constructiviste concernant l’approche énergétique des phénomènes mécaniques. Didaskalia, 16, 33-56.

Koulaidis, V. & Tsatsaroni, A. (1996). A pedagogical analysis of Science textbooks: How can we proceed? Research in Science Education, 26(1), 55-71.

Martinand, J.-L. (1986). Connaître et transformer la matière (Berne: Peter Lang).

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (London: Sage).

Petitjean, A. (1998). La transposition didactique en français. Pratiques, 97/98, 7-35.

Raisky, C. (1996). Doit-on en finir avec la transposition didactique? In C. Raisky & M. Caillot (éds) Au-delà des didactiques, le didactique. Débats autour de concepts fédérateurs (Bruxelles: De Boeck), 37-59.

Roberts, K. A. & Wilson, R. W. (2002). ICT and the research process: Issues around the compatibility of technology with qualitative data analysis [52 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Art. 23, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0202234.

Smith Ch. P. (2000). Content analysis and narrative analysis. In H. T. Reis & Ch. M. Judd (eds) Handbook of research methods in social and personality Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 313-335.

Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process [12 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Art. 26, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0202260.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.137

View Counter: Abstract | 608 | times, and PDF | 211 | times



Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras