Exploring the scientific conceptual understanding of intermediate-grade learners on Earth and Space

SHARMAINE P. FAUSTINO, JOSEPHINE O. CABRADILLA, GERALDINE S. ESTOQUE, JULIE ANNE C. FLORES, DIONISIA N. GENESE, RAPHAEL JOB R. ASUNCION

Abstract

This research study aimed to determine the scientific conceptual understanding of Earth and Space Science among intermediate-grade learners at La Union, Philippines. A descriptive research design was utilized for 299 participants (146 males and 153 females; aged 9-12 years old) using a two-tiered multiple-choice type to measure the scientific conceptual understanding of the participants. The two-tiered test was subjected to the Rasch measurement model, which can resolve guessing problems and detect outliers who answer via guessing for reliability and validity. The data results indicated that more students “do not understand the concept” and have “misconceptions”. The study found that the conceptual understanding of the pupils had significant differences in terms of grade level through Kruskal-Wallis H Test. However, a significant difference in conceptual understanding between gender in every grade level was not found using Mann-Whitney U Test. These findings highlight the importance of focusing on building a strong conceptual understanding of science in intermediate grades (4–6) by addressing foundational gaps to master science concepts and succeed

Keywords

Earth and Space Science, intermediate grade learners, misconception, scientific conceptual understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abenes, F. M. D., & Caballes, D. G. (2020). Misconceptions in chemistry of high school teachers and its origin. Data Mining and Knowledge Engineering, 12(3), 48-54. http://www.ciitresearch.org/dl/index.php/dmke/article/view/DMKE032020002.

Adadan, E., & Savaşçi, F. (2012). An analysis of 16–17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 513-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.636084.

Adodo, S. O. (2013). Effects of two-tier multiple choice diagnostic assessment items on students’ learning outcome in basic science technology (BST). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n2p201.

Agan, L. (2004). Stellar ideas: Exploring students’ understanding of stars. Astronomy Education Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2004008.

Agata, H. (2004). Rika kyuoiku houkai-syougakkou ni okeru tenmon kyouiku no genjyou to kadai. Tenmon Geppou, 97(12), 726-736. [in Japanese].

Albano, E., Jr. (2019). Grade 6 NAT scores at ‘low mastery’ level. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2019/09/26/campus-press/grade-6-nat-scores-at-low-mastery-level/621772.

Aligo, B. L., Branzuela, R. L., Faraon, C. A. G., Gardon, J. D., & Orleans, A. V. (2021). Teaching and learning electricity. A study on students’ and science teachers’ common misconceptions. Manila Journal of Science, 14, 22-34.

Allen, M. (2014). Misconceptions in Primary Science 3e. McGraw-hill Εducation.

Bailey, J. M., & Slater, T. F. (2003). A review of astronomy education research. Astronomy Education Review, 2(2), 20-45. https://doi.org/10.3847/aer2003015.

Balcı, S., Çakıroğlu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2006.49403403199.

Baldy, E. (2023). Children’s representation of the Earth at the end of elementary school: the role of spherical and geographical information carried by the globe. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 17(2), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.4479.

Bassett, M. H. (2016). Teaching critical thinking without (much) writing: Multiple‐choice and metacognition. Teaching Theology & Religion, 19(1), 20-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12318.

Bayrak, B. K. (2013). Using two-tier test to identify primary students’ conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base. Online Submission, 3(2), 19-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.21.3.2.

Bektasli, B. (2016). The relationship between preservice science teachers’ attitude toward astronomy and their understanding of basic astronomy concepts. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(1), 108-116.

Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2009). An investigation of primary school teachers’ proficiency perceptions about measurement and assessment methods: The case of Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 681-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.119.

Blanco-Chamborro, M. S., Varela-Losada, M., Lorenzo-Rial, M., & Pérez-Rodríguez, U. (2023). Revisión de investigación educativa en Astronomía en educación infantil y primaria desde 2009 hasta 2019. Acta Scientiae, 25(6), 118-156. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6814.

Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z. R., Letts IV, W.J., & Shipman, H. L. (2000). Diversity of students views about evidence, theory, and interface between science and religion in an Astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 340-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<340::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-D.

Bulunuz, N., & Jarrett, O. S. (2009). Understanding of Earth and Space Science concepts: Strategies for concept‐building in elementary teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 109(5), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18092.x.

Bulunuz, N., & Jarrett, O. S. (2010). The effects of hands-on learning stations on building American elementary teachers’ understanding about Earth and Space Science concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75230.

Cabe Trundle, K., Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., & Sackes, M. (2010). The effect of guided inquiry-based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research in Science Education, 40, 451-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9129-x.

Cabello, V., & Topping, K. (2018). Making scientific concepts explicit through explanations: Simulations of a high-leverage practice in teacher education. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education, 6(3), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1803035c.

Callison, P. L. (1993). The effect of teaching strategies using models on preservice elementary teachers' conceptions about earth-sun-moon relationships. Kansas State University.

Canuto, P. P., & Espique, F. (2023). Gender equality in science classrooms: Examining the implementation of gender responsive approach and its impact on science education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 659-678.

Chang, C., Yeh, T. K., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2009). The positive and negative effects of Science concept tests on student conceptual understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802650055.

Chi, C. (2023). Philippines still lags behind world in math, reading and science — PISA 2022. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/06/2316732/philippines-still-lags-behind-world-math-reading-and-science-pisa-2022.

Chiu, M. H., Guo, C. J., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601072774.

Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627.

Çil, E. (2015). Effect of two-tier diagnostic tests on promoting learners’ conceptual understanding of variables in conducting scientific experiments. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(4), 253-273.

Coştu, F., Özdemir, N. F., & Coştu, B. (2022). Revealing Fifth-Grade students’ understanding of the universe. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 9(1), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i1.43660.

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide Science. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/k-12/

Diani, R., Viyanti, Lengkana, D., Jalmo, T., Destiana, A., Saregar, A., & Putra, F. D. (2024). Trends, challenges, and opportunities of Multiple-Representation in Science learning: A systematic literature review. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 18(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.4657.

Doyle, M. (2020). The role of descriptive ethics in the design of research ethics procedures in the social sciences. Sentio, 2020(2), 10-14.

Fadllan, A., Prawira, W. Y., Arsini, & Hartono, H. (2019). Analysis of students’ misconceptions on mechanics using three-tier diagnostic test and clinical interview. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1170, 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012027.

Goncher, A., Jayalath, D., & Boles, W. (2016). Insights into students’ conceptual understanding using textual analysis: A case study in signal processing. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(3), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2016.2515563.

Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 901-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199610)33:8.

Hayes, B. C. (2001). Gender, scientific knowledge, and attitudes toward the environment: A cross-national analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 54(3), 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400309

Hung, P., Hwang, G., Lee, Y., & Su, I. (2012). A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 762-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.018.

Jia, C., Yang, T., Qian, Y., & Wu, X. (2020). The gender differences in science achievement, interest, habit, and creativity: A national representative evidence from China. Science Education International, 31(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.9.

Jugueta, E. A. D., Go, C. K. C., & Indias, J. M. M. (2012). Free fall misconceptions: A comparison between science and non-science university majors. Latin America Journal of Physics Education, 6(Suppl. 1), 145-148.

Kang, J., & Yoo, P. (2018). A study on the change in science concept according to the characteristics of elementary school students in the face of an anomalous situation including misconception. Saemulli/Saemulri, 68(10), 1107-1115. https://doi.org/10.3938/npsm.68.1107.

Kang, N., & Howren, C. (2004). Teaching for conceptual understanding. National Science Teaching Association, 42(1), 28-32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ722110.

Kanli, U. (2015). Using a two-tier test to analyse students’ and teachers’ alternative concepts in astronomy. Science Education International, 26(2), 148-165.

Koerber, S., Mayer, D., Osterhaus, C., Schwippert, K., & Sodian, B. (2014). The development of scientific thinking in elementary school: A comprehensive inventory. Child Development, 86(1), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12298.

Kurnaz, M. A. (2016). Determining students' comprehension of the star, comet, and constellation concepts. DergiPark, Istanbul University, Turkey. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aibuefd/issue/1504/18240.

Laeli, C. M. H., Gunarhadi, & Muzzazinah. (2020). Misconception of science learning in primary school students. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019) (pp. 657-671). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.083.

Lengkong, M., Istiyono, E., Rampean, B., Tumanggor, A. M. R., & Nirmala, M. (2021). Development of two-tier test instruments to detect student’s physics misconception. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Development-of-Two-Tier-Test-Instruments-to-Detect-Lengkong-Istiyono/c5c716537c8e176db451b43803026105a3abc01c.

Lin, Y. C. (2016). Diagnosing students’ misconceptions in number sense via a web-based two-tier test. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(1), 41-55.

Lindell, R. S. (2001). Enhancing college students’ understanding of lunar phases. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3022646/.

Lock, R. (1992). Gender and practical skill performance in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290304.

McClure, B., & Machholz, D. (2023). Polaris – the north star – is part of the little dipper. Earthsky. Updates on your cosmos and world. https://earthsky.org/brightest-stars/polaris-the-present-day-north-star/.

Mi, S., Lu, S., & Bi, H. (2020). Trends and foundations in research on students’ conceptual understanding in Science Education: A Method based on the structural topic model. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 551-568. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.551.

Novak, J. D. (1988). Learning science and the Science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15(1), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268808559949.

Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two‐tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320106.

Ozdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414.

Ozkan, G., & Akcay, H. (2016). Preservice Science teachers' beliefs about Astronomy concepts. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2092-2099. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040921.

Parker, J., & Heywood, D. I. (1998). The earth and beyond: Developing primary teachers’ understanding of basic astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 503-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200501.

Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 768-787. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20355

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207.

Prabha, S. (2020). Students’ views on difficulties in conceptual understanding of science at secondary stage. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 16, 1-10. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1161555.

Putri, F. E., Hermita, N., Zufriady, Z., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). Identifying sixth-grade students’ misconceptions on solar system. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education, 4(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.33578/jtlee.v4i1.7857.

Ravanis, K., & Boilevin, J.-M. (2009). A comparative approach to the representation of light for five-, eight- and ten-year-old children: Didactical perspectives. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(3), 182-190.

Rogayan, D. V., & Albino, M. (2019). Filipino students’ common mısconceptıons in bıology: Input for remedial teaching. Online Science Education Journal, 4(2), 90-103. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/870304.

San Juan, D. M. M. S. (2023). Three policy imperatives on budgetary priorities, medium of instruction, and curricular content towards raising the quality of education in the Philippines. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32570.77762.

Sewell, A. (2002). Constructivism and student misconceptions: Why every teacher needs to know about them. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 48(4), 24-28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ663435.

Shepardson, D. P., & Pizzini, E. L. (1994). Gender, achievement, and perception toward Science activities. School Science and Mathematics, 94(4), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1994.tb15653.x.

Siswaningsih, W., Firman, H., Zackiyah, & Khoirunnisa, A. N. (2017). Development of two-tier diagnostic test pictorial-based for identifying high school students misconceptions on the mole concept. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 812, 012117. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012117.

Slater, S. (2018). International Studies of Astronomy Education Research Database (iSTAR). Robotic Telescopes, Student Research and Education Proceedings, 1(1), 341-342. https://doi.org/10.32374/rtsre.2017.035.

Smith, V., Sweet, C., Schoening, B., Hornbostel, H., James, S., Thomassy, M., Norton, D., Fullerton, T., Peacock, A., & Ward-Smith, P. (2022). The gravitational pull of the full moon to explain phenomenon: Superstition or Science. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(10), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.1010012.

Sule, A., & Jawkar, S. (2019). Teacher’s misconception in curricular Astronomy. EPJ Web of Conferences, 200, 01012. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201920001012.

Syuhendri, S., Siahaan, S. M., & Pasaribu, A. (2022). Lunar phases refutation texts: Supplement texts to overcome students’ misconceptions. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(6), 157-160. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.6.504.

Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204.

Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902951429.

Türer, B., & Kunt, H. (2015). A review of relationship between prospective Science teachers' attitudes towards Science Education and their self-efficacy. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 166-178.

Wardani, D. S., Widodo, A., & Puspita, R. D. (2023). The effect of the empirical base Nature of Science learning model on the understanding of Nature of Science in empirical aspect. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 12(2), 245-253.

Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in Science Education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012044.

Yağbasan, R., & Gülçiçek Ç. (2003). Defining characteristics of misconception in science teaching. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal, 1(13), 102-119.

Yang, T.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G.-H. (2015). A two-tier test-based approach to improving students’ computer-programming skills in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 198.

Yatskiv, Y. S., & Vavilova, I. B. (2009). Astronomy education and scientific schools in Ukraine. In Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 5(S260) (pp. 696-703). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743921311003048.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.5265

View Counter: Abstract | 676 | times, and PDF | 67 | times



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras