The effect of using open-ended problems in primary school Geometry teaching

DINA KAMBER HAMZIĆ, AMRA DURAKOVIĆ, IRMA CHAHIN

Abstract

Geometry is an essential part of mathematics, however numerous studies and international tests indicate weaker student achievements in geometry. Differentiated teaching with open-ended problems has improved learning in other areas of mathematics and it may benefit geometry as well. The goal of this study was to investigate whether the incorporating of open-ended problems can improve students’ achievements in geometry. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with students of the fifth and seventh grade of primary school. Results showed improved performance among older students, but no significant effect on younger students. This raises the question of the effectiveness of this approach with younger students.

Keywords

Geometry, open-ended problems, primary school students

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aboagye, K. O., Ke, Y. D., & Mante, D. A. (2021). Factors influencing students’ perceived difficulties in studying Geometry: A case of Konogo-Odumasi, Ghana. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(9), 526-540. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.99038.

APOSO (Agency for Pre-primary, Primary and Secondary Education). (2009). Sekundarna analiza TIMSS 2007 u Bosni i Hercegovini [Secondary analysis of TIMSS 2007 in Bosnia and Herzegovina]. Agency for Pre-primary, Primary and Secondary Education (APOSO), Sarajevo. https://aposo.gov.ba/sadrzaj/uploads/Sekundarna-analiza-TIMSS.pdf.

APOSO (Agency for Pre-primary, Primary and Secondary Education). (2015). Zajednička jezgra nastavnih planova i programa za matematičko područje definisanа na ishodima učenja [Common core curriculum for mathematics area defined on the learning outcomes]. Agency for Pre-primary, Primary and Secondary Education (APOSO), Mostar. https://aposo.gov.ba/sadrzaj/uploads/ZJNPP-matemati%C4%8Dko-podru%C4%8Dje-BOSANSKI.pdf.

Al-Absi, М. (2013).The effect of open-ended tasks - as an assessment tool - on fourth graders’ Μathematics achievement, and assessing students’ perspectives about it. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3), 345-351. https://jjes.yu.edu.jo/index.php/jjes/article/view/778.

Aydogan, A. (2007). The effect of dynamic Geometry use together with open-ended explorations in sixth grade students’ performances in polygons and similarity and congruency of polygons. Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/3/12608990/index.pdf.

Babić, V. (2016). Zadaci otvorenog tipa u nastavi matematike [The open-ended tasks in mathematic]. Master’s thesis. Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia. https://repozitorij.mathos.hr/islandora/object/mathos%3A60/datastream/PDF/view.

Bishop, A. J. (1986). What are some obstacles to learning geometry. In R. Morris (Ed.), Studies in Mathematics Education: Teaching of Geometry (vol. 5, pp. 141-159). UNESCO.

Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed Mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.29.1.0041.

Borgersen, H. E. (1994). Open ended problem solving in geometry. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 6-35. https://tidsskrift.dk/NOMAD/article/view/146040/189262.

Bursill-Hall, P. (2002). Why do we study geometry? Answers through the ages. DPMMS Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, 1-31. https://www.bxscience.edu/ourpages/auto/2009/2/26/52221620/Why%20Do%20We%20Study%20Geometry.pdf.

Cangür, Ş., Sungur, M. A., & Ankaralı, H. (2018). The methods used in Nonparametric Covariance Analysis. Duzce Medical Journal, 20(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.424774.

Choudhary, A., Dogne, N., & Maheshwari, S. (2014). Mathematics and Architecture: Importance of Geometry. Paper presented at NCAICT: National Conference on Advances in Information and Communication Technology, TEQIP-II/EE/AICMT-5. https://www.scribd.com/document/741590930/Mathematics-and-Architecture-Importance-of-Geometry.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of Geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0.

Danlami, K. B., Zakariya, Y. F., Balarabe, B., Alotaibi, S. B., & Alrosaa, T. M. (2025). Improving students’ performance in geometry: An empirical evidence of the effectiveness of brainstorming learning strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1577912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1577912.

Decision on the adoption of the curriculum for Mathematics for primary schools and grammar schools in the Republic of Croatia [Odluka o donošenju kurikuluma za nastavni predmet Matematike za osnovne škole i gimnazije u Republici Hrvatskoj NN 7/2019]. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2019_01_7_146.html.

Dugay, P. M. V., & Pasia, A. E. (2023). An open-ended approach in developing students’ proficiencies in Geometry. International Journal of Open-Access, Interdisciplinary and New Educational Discoveries of ETCOR Educational Research Center, 2(3), 658-682. https://etcor.org/storage/iJOINED/Vol.%20II(3),%20658-682.pdf.

Džumhur, Ž. (2021). TIMSS 2019: Izvještaj za Bosnu i Hercegovinu [TIMSS 2019: Report for Bosnia and Herzegovina]. Agency for Pre-primary, Primary and Secondary Education (APOSO), Sarajevo. https://aposo.gov.ba/sadrzaj/uploads/TIMSS-izvjestaj-2019-BOSANSKI.pdf

Federal Ministry of Education and Science. (n.d.). Okvirni nastavni plan i program za devetogodišnju osnovnu školu u Federaciji Bosne i Hercegovine [Framework curriculum for nine-year primary school in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina]. https://edukatorirehabilitator.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/okvirni-npp.pdf.

Hashimoto Y. (1997). The methods of fostering creativity through mathematical problem solving. ZDM, 29, 86-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0005-8.

Hwang, W. Y., Hoang, A., & Tu, Y. H. (2020). Exploring authentic contexts with ubiquitous Geometry to facilitate elementary school students’ Geometry learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00476-y.

Irawan, A., & Surya, E. (2017). Application of the open ended approach to Mathematics learning in the sub-subject of rectangular. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 33(3), 270-279. https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/7539.

Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and learning of geometry. A literature review on current developments in theory and practice. Education Sciences, 13(7), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070682.

Jones, K. (2002). Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: perspectives on practice (pp. 121-139). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Kwadwo, A. E., & Asomani, W. D. (2021). Investigating colleges of education students’ difficulty in understanding circle Geometry. ADRRI Journal of Physical and Natural Sciences, 4(3), 1-27.

Kwon, O. N., Park, J. H., & Park, J. S. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036784.

Mihajlović, A. (2014). Razvijanje kreativnosti u početnoj nastavi matematike metodom otvorenog pristupa [Developing creativity in the initial mathematics teaching classes by the method of open approach]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 63(2), 229-243.

Mihajlović, A., & Dejić, M. (2015). Using open-ended problems and problem posing activities in elementary mathematics classroom. In F. M. Singer, F. Toader & C. Voica (Eds), The 9th Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness International Conference Proceedings (pp. 34-40). Sinaia, Romania.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020).

TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2020-12/TIMSS%202019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf.

Nasution, E. Y. P., Yulia, P., Anggraini, R. S., Putri, R., & Sari, M. (2021). Correlation between mathematical creative thinking ability and mathematical creative thinking disposition in Geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1778. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012001 10.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.

OECD. (2024). An evolution of Mathematics curriculum: Where it was, where it stands and where it is going. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/0ffd89d0-en.

Oogarah-Pratap, B., Bholoa, A., & Ramma, Y. (2020). Stage theory of cognitive development. Jean Piaget. In B. Akpan, & T. J. Kennedy (Eds), Science Education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 133-148). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_10.

Pasani, C. F. (2019). Analyzing elementary school students Geometry comprehension based on Van Hiele’s theory. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.5.31.

Rizos, I., & Gkrekas, N. (2023). Incorporating history of mathematics in open-ended problem solving: An empirical study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), em2242. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13025.

Samphantakul, N., & Thinwiangthong, S. (2019). Mathematical conceptual understanding about Geometry of 8th grade students in classroom using lesson study and open approach with the geometer’s sketchpad. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012088.

Savić D. (2020). The role of open-ended tasks in the development of student activities and creative thinking. Croatian Journal of Education, 22(1), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v22i1.3316.

Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). Enriching Mathematics Education with Visual Arts: Effects on elementary school students’ ability in Geometry and Visual Arts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 1613-1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10018-z.

Shillo, R., Hoernle, N., & Gal, K. (2019). Detecting creativity in an open ended Geometry environment. Paper presented at International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM). Montreal, Canada.

Simamora, R. E., & Kamara, J. G. (2024). Unlocking mathematical creativity: How students solve open-ended Geometry problems. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(1), 66-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp66-86.

Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM, 47, 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0693-4.

Sulistiowati, D. L., Herman, T., & Jupri, A. (2019). Student difficulties in solving geometry problem based on Van Hiele thinking level. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042118.

Tanjung, D. F., Syahputra, E., & Irvan, I. (2020). Problem Based Learning, discovery learning and open ended models: An experiment on mathematical problem solving abilities. Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika, 4(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1736.

Taylor, C. H. (2008). Promoting mathematical understanding through open-ended tasks; Experiences of an eighth-grade gifted Geometry class. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, USA. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/214037198.pdf.

Ulinnuha, R., Budi Waluya, S., & Rochmad, R. (2021). Creative thinking ability with open-ended problems based on self-efficacy in gnomio blended learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(A), 20-25. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/34277.

Velichová, D. (2002). Geometry in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(3), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790210141979.

Zhu, Y., & Tan-Foo, K. F. (2005). An analysis of Singapore secondary students’ performance on open-ended tasks in mathematics. Paper presented at International conference on education, Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice. Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.5408

View Counter: Abstract | 174 | times, and PDF | 38 | times



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras