Semiotic multiplicities and contradictions in science learning
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012) Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918-925.
Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Proceedings of the national academy of sciences (pp. 13269-13273). USA, 105 36). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803424105.
Chachlioutaki, M.-E., Pantidos, P., & Kampeza, M. (2016). Changing semiotic modes indicates the introduction of new elements in children’s reasoning: The case of earthquakes. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 3(2), 198-208.
Chang, N. (2012). What are the roles that children’s drawings play in inquiry of science concepts? Early Child Development and Care, 182(5), 621-637.
Church, R. B. (1999). Using gesture and speech to capture transitions in learning. Cognitive Development, 14(2), 313-342.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Einarsdottir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217-232.
Fragkiadaki, G., Fleer, M., & Ravanis, K. (2019). A cultural-historical study of the development of children’s scientific thinking about clouds in everyday life. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1523-1545.
Garbarini, F., & Adenzato, M. (2004). At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition, 56(1), 100-106.
Givry, D., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Toward a new conception of conceptions: Interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 1086-1109.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). What the hands can tell us about language emergence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 213-218.
Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75(1), 3–13.
Han, I. (2013). Embodiment: A new perspective for evaluating physicality in learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49, 41-59.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2002). A study of the development of the concept of mechanical stability in preschool children. Research in Science Education, 32, 373-391.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Anastasiou, L., Konsolas, M., & Prevezanou, B. (2009). A study of the effect of preschool children’s participation in sensorimotor activities on their understanding of the mechanical equilibrium of a balance beam. Research in Science Education, 39, 39-55.
Hardiman, P. T., Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1986). Learning to understand the balance beam. Cognition and Instruction, 3(1), 63-86.
Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 52, pp. 265-297). Academic Press.
Herakleioti, E., & Pantidos, P. (2016). The contribution of the human body in young children’s explanations about shadow formation. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 21-42.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. Psychology Press.
Kontra, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 731-739.
Lakatos, G., Gácsi, M., Topál, J., & Miklósi, Á. (2012). Comprehension and utilisation of pointing gestures and gazing in dog-human communication in relatively complex situations. Animal Cognition, 15(2), 201-213.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). The world of perception. Routledge.
Orabona, F., Caputo, B., Fillbrandt, A., & Ohl, F. W. (2009). A theoretical framework for transfer of knowledge across modalities in artificial and biological systems. In 2009 IEEE 8th International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE. 10.1109/DEVLRN.2009.5175515
Ortiz, L. G., Heron, P. R., & Shaffer, P. S. (2005). Student understanding of static equilibrium: Predicting and accounting for balancing. American Journal of Physics, 73(6), 545-553.
Pantidos, P., & Givry, D. (2021). A semiotic approach for the teaching of energy: linking mechanical work and heat with the world of objects and events. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 15(2), 5-30.
Ping, R., Church, R. B., Decatur, M. A., Larson, S. W., Zinchenko, E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2021). Unpacking the gestures of chemistry learners: What the hands tell us about correct and incorrect conceptions of stereochemistry. Discourse Processes, 58(3), 213-232.
Pizzuto, G., & Cangelosi, A. (2019). Exploring deep models for comprehension of deictic gesture-word combinations in cognitive robotics. In 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE. 10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852425
Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi‐modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843-1866.
Roth, W. (2003). From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: The bridging function of gestures. Pragmatics and Cognition, 11, 141-170.
Roth, W.-M., & Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 103-136.
Roth, W. M., Goulart, M. I. M., & Plakitsi, K. (2012). Science Education during early childhood: A cultural-historical Perspective. Springer Science and Business Media.
Sarıoğlan, A. B., & Küçüközer, H. (2014). 11th grade students’ conceptual understanding about torque concept: A longitudinal study. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 6(2), 162-175.
Siegler, R. S., & Klahr, D. (1982). Why do children learn? The relationship between existing knowledge and the acquisition of new knowledge. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Shapiro, L. (2019). Embodied cognition. Routledge.
Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1994). Children’s integration of speech and pointing gestures in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57(3), 327-354.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058
Yildirim, I., & Jacobs, R. A. (2013). Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 126(2), 135-148.
Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21, 317-331.
Zhang, D., & Grégoire, É. (2011). The landscape of inconsistency: A perspective. International Journal of Semantic Computing, 5(03), 235-256.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.4510
View Counter: Abstract | 319 | times, and PDF | 114 | times
Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.
Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras