Contextes et stratégies de médiatisation des MOOC de France Université Numérique : influences sur la conception et la scénarisation pédagogique

EMMANUEL BURGUETE, VIVIANA URREGO

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify the contexts and strategies that guide designers in the creation of MOOC. A thematic and lexicometric analysis was conducted on the discourse of 15 MOOC designers from France Université Numérique. The aim was to gain insights into their decision-making processes regarding the adoption of either a teacher-centered pedagogy or an active pedagogy approach. Key variables such as the academic model, team composition, training, and the role of learning designers emerged as significant factors. Further research is necessary to deepen our understanding and quantify these influences in the field of MOOC design.

Keywords

MOOC, instructional design, pedagogical scenario, Active Pedagogy, Microlearning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alber, A. (2018). Presentation of the Software Program SONAL. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 137‑138(1), 176‑200.

Bakki, A., Oubahssi, L., George, S., & Cherkaoui, C. (2020). A model and tool to support pedagogical scenario building for connectivist MOOC. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(4), 899‑927.

Basil, A., & Aldabbagh, M. (2023). Exploring the advancements in MOOC studies: A 2008-2022 overview. MINAR International Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(1), 14‑23.

Boumazguida, K., Temperman, G., Derobertmasure, A., & De Lièvre, B. (2022). Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ? RIPES, 38(3), 1-29.

Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., Randon-Furling J., Viguier-Williams, A., & Pasquinelli, E. (2016). Mets-toi ça dans la tête ! Les stratégies d’apprentissage à la lumière des sciences cognitives. Genève: Éditions Markus Haller.

Burguete, E. (2021). Proposition d’une méthodologie de conception et d’évaluation d’un SPOC en microlearning. Revue Adjectif, T1. https://adjectif.net/spip.php?article547.

Burguete, E. (2022). Des liens étroits entre l’ingénierie de formation des MOOCs et le microlearning. In C. Martin & R. Battiston (Dir.), Journées Doctorales des Humanités et des Sciences Humaines et Sociales 2021 (pp. 126‑136). https://jdhuha.hypotheses.org/

Carré, P. (2023). Sept « familles » de recherche : Introduction au dossier. Savoirs, 61-62(1), 11-25.

Chansanam, W., Poonpon, K., Manakul, T., & Detthamrong, U. (2021). Success and challenges in MOOCs: A literature systematic review technique. TEM Journal, 10(4), 1728‑1732.

Cisel, M., & Bruillard, E. (2012). Chronique des MOOC. Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 19(1), 49‑73.

De Gagne, J. C., Park, H. K., Hall, K., Woodward, A., Yamane, S., & Kim, S. S. (2019). Microlearning in health professions education: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(2), 1-10.

Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 129, 48‑60.

Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 245‑262.

Depover, C., Karsenti, T., & Komis, V. (2017). Pour comprendre les MOOCs : Nature, enjeux et perspectives. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Descamps, L., & Ballanger, S. (2023). Scénarisation pédagogique. In B. Doucey & C. Goï (Éds.), Vocabulaire de l’ingénierie pédagogique (pp. 172-173). Tours, Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais.

Emprin, E. (2018). Les apports d’une analyse statistique des données textuelles pour les recherches en didactique : L’exemple de la méthode Reinert. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 23, 179-200.

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference (pp. 41-50). Atlanta.

Håklev, S., Faucon, L., Hadzilacos, T., & Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Orchestration graphs: Enabling rich social pedagogical scenarios in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. Cambridge. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148028398.pdf.

Henri, F., Compte, C., & Charlier, B. (2007). La scénarisation pédagogique dans tous ses débats…. Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie Universitaire, 4(2), 14-24.

Huang, H., Jew, L., & Qi, D. (2023). Take a MOOC and then drop: A systematic review of MOOC engagement pattern and dropout factor. Heliyon, 9(4), 1-12.

Hug, T. (2005). Micro Learning and narration: Exploring possibilities of utilization of narrations and storytelling for the designing of « micro units » and didactical micro-learning arrangements. Paper presented at the fourth Media in Transition conference, Cambridge, 6-8 May.

Hug, T. (2007). Didactics of microlearning: Concepts, discourses and examples. Münster, Waxmann.

Ichiuji, B. A., DeAngelis, E. J., Corpodean, F., Thompson, J., Arsenault, L., Amdur, R. L., Vaziri, K., Lee, J., & Jackson, H. T. (2022). The effect of a microlearning module on knowledge acquisition in surgery clerkship students. Journal of Surgical Education, 79(2), 409‑416.

Irwanto, I., Wahyudiati, D., Saputro, A. D., & Lukman, I. R. (2023). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in higher education: A bibliometric analysis (2012-2022). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(2), 1-9.

Jarnac de Freitas, M., & Mira da Silva, M. (2023). Systematic literature review about gamification in MOOCs. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 38(1), 73‑95.

Johar, N. A., Kew, S. N., Tasir, Z., & Koh, E. (2023). Learning Analytics on student engagement to enhance students’ learning performance: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(10), 7849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107849.

Kossen, C., & Ooi, C.-Y. (2021). Trialling micro-learning design to increase engagement in online courses. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(3), 299-310.

Lan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs : A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5.

Lieury, A. (2020). Mémoire et réussite scolaire. Malakoff: Dunod.

Mahmod, M. A., Ali, A. Md., & Shah, A. (2018). Massive Open Online Courses as an augmentation of E-Learning: A review. International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing, 4(2), 1‑4.

Masson, S. (2020). Activer ses neurones pour mieux apprendre et enseigner. Paris: Odile Jacob.

Ogunyemi, A. A., Quaicoe, J. S., & Bauters, M. (2022). Indicators for enhancing learners’ engagement in massive open online courses: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100088.

Ortoleva, G., Peltier, C., & Bétrancourt, M. (2017). MOOC : Un mot, plusieurs facettes. Pour une caractérisation systématique des MOOC orientée ingénierie pédagogique. Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 24(2), 65‑86.

Orwoll, B., Diane, S., Henry, D., Tsang, L., Chu, K., Meer, C., Hartman, K., & Roy-Burman, A. (2018). Gamification and microlearning for engagement with quality improvement (GAMEQI): A bundled digital intervention for the prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infection. American Journal of Medical Quality, 33(1), 21‑29.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Peraya, D. (2017). Au centre des MOOC, les capsules vidéo : Un renouveau de la télévision éducative ? Distances et Médiations des Savoirs, 17, 1-23.

Pernin, J.-P. (2003). Objets pédagogiques : Unités d’apprentissage, activités ou ressources. Sciences et Techniques Educatives, HS, 179‑210.

Ratinaud, P. (2023). IRaMuTeQ. http://iramuteq.org/.

Raynal, F., & Rieunier, A. (2016). Pédagogie, dictionnaire des concepts clés : Apprentissage, formation, psychologie cognitive. Issy-les-Moulineaux: ESF.

Romadhon, M. S., Junus, K., Santoso, H. B., Ahmad, M., & Purwandari, E. P. (2023). Factors influencing students’ continuance intention in learning through MOOCs: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(2), 425-441.

Sankaranarayanan, R., Leung, J., Abramenka-Lachheb, V., Seo, G., & Lachheb, A. (2023). Microlearning in diverse contexts: A bibliometric analysis. TechTrends, 67(2), 260‑276.

Shah, V., Murthy, S., Warriem, J., Sahasrabudhe, S., Banerjee, G., & Iyer, S. (2022). Learner-centric MOOC model: A pedagogical design model towards active learner participation and higher completion rates. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 263‑288.

Souza, M. A. R, Wall, M. L., Thuler, A. C. M. C., Lowen, I. M. V., & Peres, A. M. (2018). The use of IRAMUTEQ software for data analysis in qualitative research. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP, 52, e03353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017015003353.

Spector, J. M. (2014). Emerging educational technologies: Tensions and synergy. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 5‑10.

Stöhr, C., Stathakarou, N., Mueller, F., Nifakos, S., & McGrath, C. (2019). Videos as learning objects in MOOCs : A study of specialist and non‐specialist participants’ video activity in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 166‑176.

Tang, H., & Qian, Y. (2022). Designing MOOCs with LITTLE. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2064411. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2064411.

Tcheng Blairon, C., & Cristol, D. (2020). MOOC, engagement et apprentissage : L’ingénierie pédagogique au service de l’apprenance. Paris: l’Harmattan.

Torgerson, C. (2021). What is microlearning? Origin, definitions, and applications. In J. R. Corbeil, B. H. Khan & M. E. Corbeil (Éds.), Microlearning in the digital age: The design and delivery of learning in snippets (pp. 14‑31). New-York: Routledge.

Van Campenhoudt, L., Marquet, J., & Quivy, R. (2017). Manuel de recherche en sciences sociales (5e éd.). Malakoff: Dunod.

Wang, R., Cao, J., Xu, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Learning engagement in massive open online courses: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1074435. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1074435.

Zhu, M. (2021). Enhancing MOOC learners’ skills for self-directed learning. Distance Education, 42(3), 441‑460.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.4527

View Counter: Abstract | 1295 | times, and PDF | 213 | times



Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras