Constructing mathematical proofs through abductive reasoning

SOFFIL WIDADAH, TATAG YULI EKO SISWONO, ROOSELYNA EKAWATI

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the utilization of abductive reasoning in the construction of mathematical proofs among students. The research adopts a qualitative methodology, involving eight prospective teacher candidates with advanced mathematical proficiency. Data were analyzed by Toulmin's Argumentation Theory. The findings revealed that two participants employed abductive reasoning. These participants applied overcode abduction yet adhered to all the stages of abductive reasoning. Abductive reasoning can significantly contribute to the construction of mathematical proofs and facilitate the development of students' mathematical competencies. The implications of this study include the potential for developing instruments to measure abductive reasoning skills.

Keywords

Constructing proof, mathematical proficiency, abductive reasoning algebraic proofs

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bair, S. L., & Rich, B. S. (2011). Characterizing the development of specialized mathematical content knowledge for teaching in algebraic reasoning and number theory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(4), 292-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.608345.

Beirlaen, M., & Aliseda, A. (2014). A conditional logic for abduction. Synthese, 191, 3733-3758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0496-0.

Bellucci, F., & Bellucci, F. (2019). Eco and Peirce on abduction. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, X-1. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1122.

Carreira, S., Amado, N., & Jacinto, H. (2020). Venues for analytical reasoning problems: How children produce deductive reasoning. Education Sciences, 10(6), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060169.

Cramer-Petersen, C. L., Christensen, B. T., & Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2019). Empirically analysing design reasoning patterns: Abductive-deductive reasoning patterns dominate design idea generation. Design Studies, 60, 39-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.001.

Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. S., & Tanguay, D. (2012). Examining the role of logic in teaching proof. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds), Proof and proving in mathematics education: the 19th ICMI study (pp. 369-389). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_16.

Font, V., Godino, J. D., & Gallardo, J. (2013). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9411-0.

Jeon, J., & Shin, D. (2022). Students' abductive reasoning according to scientific and historical knowledge. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 10(5), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2022.100505.

Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8

Knipping, C., & Reid, D. (2015). Reconstructing argumentation structures: A perspective on proving processes in secondary mathematics classroom interactions. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping & N. Presmeg (Eds), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 75-101). Berlin: Springer.

Magnani, L. (2022). Human abductive cognition vindicated: Computational locked strategies, dissipative brains, and eco-cognitive openness. Philosophies, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7010015.

Miyazaki, M. (2000). Levels of proof in lower secondary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 47-68.

Olsen, J., & Gjerding, A. (2019). Modalities of abduction: A philosophy of science-based investigation of abduction. Human Arenas, 2, 129-152

Pedemonte, B., & Reid, D. (2011). The role of abduction in proving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 281-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9275-0.

Peirce, C. S. (1878/1992). Deduction, induction and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds), The Essential Peirce - Selected Philosophical Writings (pp. 470-482). Indiana University Press: Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Peirce, C. S. (1903). Harvard lectures on Pragmatism: Lecture II. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (CP), 5, 64. Cambridge, MA.

Rapanta, C. (2018). Teaching as abductive reasoning: The role of argumentation. Informal Logic, 38(2), 293-311.

Schurz, G. (2021). Patterns of abductive inference. In Springer Handbook of model-based science (pp. 151-173). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4

Siswono, T. Y. E., Hartono, S., & Kohar, A. W. (2020). Deductive or inductive? Prospective teachers' preference of proof method on an intermediate proof task. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 417-438.

Stylianides, G. J., Sandefur, J., & Watson, A. (2016). Conditions for proving by mathematical induction to be explanatory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.04.002.

Weber, K., Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2014). How mathematicians obtain conviction: Implications for Mathematics instruction and research on epistemic cognition. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 3658. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.865527.

Widadah, S., Juniati, D., & Khabibah, S. (2022). Deductive reasoning of student teacher candidates: A study of number theory. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 31-38.

Williamson, T. (2016). Abductive philosophy. The Philosophical Forum, 47(3-4), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12122.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.5025

View Counter: Abstract | 136 | times, and PDF | 14 | times



Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras