Teachers’ focus on pupils prior conceptions in Inquiry-Based teaching

KATARÍNA KOTUĽÁKOVÁ

Abstract

An important component of inquiry-based instruction is identifying pupils’ previous experience and knowledge about phenomena under study and reflecting on it during the investigation. This paper focuses on teachers’ ways to identify and use the existing ideas and previous experience of pupils concerning the subject. We monitored to what extent teachers take pupils’ ideas - once these are revealed - into account, how they reflect on them in the initial phases of forming predictions and hypotheses and how they incorporate them into their teaching. We gathered our data by observing in-service teachers implementing inquiry-based science education (IBSE) in their classes. These teachers, who were also interviewed, were taking part in an IBSE-training project and were teaching at junior high level of a grade school (ISCED 2). Results of the performed qualitative analysis show teachers’ difficulties in revealing children’s previous knowledge, uncertainty how to deal with it once revealed and lack of flexibility.

Keywords

Inquiry-based science education, previous experience, previous knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baxter, L. M. & Kurtz, M. J. (2001). When a hypothesis is not an educated guess. Science and Children, 38(7), 18-20.

Bischoff, P. J. (2006). The role of knowledge structures in the ability of pre-service elementary teachers to diagnose a child’s understanding of molecular kinetics. Science Education, 90, 936-951.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking (1999). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school (Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press).

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (New York: Routledge).

De Jong, T. & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179 – 201.

Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in Science (Philadelphia: Open University Press).

Etkina, E., Karelina, A. & Villasenor, M. R. (2007). Studying transfer of scientific reasoning abilities. In L. McCullough, L. Hsu, & P. Heron (eds), 2006 Physics Education Research Conference (Syracuse, NY: AIP), 883, 93-96.

Fensham, P., Gunstone, R. & White, R. (1994). The content of Science (London: Routledge/Falmer).

Fibonacci Project (2013). Disseminating inquiry-based science and mathematics education in Europe, (http://www.fibonacci-project.eu/).

Glynn, S. M., Yeanny, R. H. & Britton, B. K. (1991). The Psychology of leaning Science (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).

Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ Science misconceptions: implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437 – 454.

Gooding, J. & Metz, B. (2011). From misconception to conceptual change. Science Teacher, 78(4), 34-37.

Harlen, W. (2000). Teaching of Science in Primary Schools (London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd).

Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689.

Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about misconceptions: pre-service secondary science teachers views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927-959.

Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P. & Hagemans, M. G. (2008). The influence of domain knowledge on strategy use during simulation-based inquiry learning. Leaning and Instruction, 18, 580-592.

Lucariello, J. (2013). How do I get my students over their alternative conceptions (misconceptions) for learning? (http://www.apa.org/education/k12/misconceptions.aspx?item=1).

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography – Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2),177-200.

Monk, M. & Osborne, J. (2000). Good practice in Science teaching: what research has to say (Buckingham: Open University Press).

Morison, J. & Lederman, N. (2003). Science teachers diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87(6), 849-869.

Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W. & De Jong, T. (2010). Finding out how they find it out: an empirical analysis of inquiry learners’ need for support. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 2033-2053.

Tools for Enhancing Inquiry in Science Education (2012). (Recourses http://www.fibonacci-project.eu/)

Xiaobao, L. & Yeping, L. (2008). Research on students' misconceptions to improve teaching and learning in school Mathematics and Science. School Science & Mathematics, 108(1), 4-7.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.2045

View Counter: Abstract | 317 | times, and PDF | 164 | times



Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras