Can the history of the balance of nature-idea inform the design of narratives for highlighting general aspects of nature of science?

GEORGIOS AMPATZIDIS, MARIDA ERGAZAKI

Abstract

The idea of the Balance of Nature (BON-idea), which implies a predetermined order and stability guaranteed by a God’s will or nature itself, is much older than the science of ecology and had a remarkable influence on it. It seems that the history of the BON-idea might be used for highlighting Nature of Science (NOS). Our study concerns whether it is actually feasible to draw on the BON-idea history in order to design historical narratives that could effectively support students to reach a better understanding of general NOS aspects. In this paper, we focus on which general NOS aspects could be highlighted by the BON-idea history and how. So, we argue that the BON-idea history can offer resources for the design of narratives that outline scientific knowledge as (i) influenced by socio-cultural contexts, (ii) mediated by creativity, and (iii) subject to change.

Keywords

Nature of Science, history of science, balance of nature

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). The evolving l and scape related to assessment of nature of science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on Science Education (pp. 621-650). New York, NY: Routledge.

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.

Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching Nature of Science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461-486.

Allee, W. C., Emerson, A. E., Park, O., Emerson, T., & Schmidt, K. P. (1949). Principles of Animal Ecology. London, England: Saunders Company.

Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2014). Towards a learning environment for challenging the idea of the balanced nature: Insights from the first cycle of research. In C. P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris & A. Hadjigeorgiou (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science Education Research For Evidence-based Teaching and Coherence in Learning. Part 3 (pp. 44-54). Nicosia, Cyprus: European Science Education Research Association.

Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2016). Can the idea of “Balance of Nature” be effectively challenged within a model-based learning environment? Insights from the second cycle of developmental research. In T. Tal & A. Yarden (Eds.), The Future of Biology Education Research (pp. 7-20). Haifa, Israel: ERIDOB.

Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2017). Toward an “Anti-Balance of Nature” learning environment for non-biology major students: Learning objectives and design criteria. Natural Sciences Education, 46(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2017.07.0016.

Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2018a). Can the idea of the ‘balanced nature’ be challenged? Students’ reasoning about disturbed and protected ecosystems after a teaching intervention and one year later. In N. Gericke & M. Grace (Eds.), Challenges in Biology Education Research (pp. 20-36). Karlstad, Sweden: ERIDOB.

Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2018b). Challenging Students’ Belief in the ‘Balance of Nature’ Idea. Science & Education, 27(9), 895-919.

Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-Based instruction and teaching about Nature of Science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497-526.

Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant succession: An analysis of the development of vegetation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.

Clough, M. P. (2011). The story behind the Science: Bringing Science and scientists to life in post-secondary Science Education. Science & Education, 20(7), 701-717.

Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of Nature of Science. Science & Education, 28(3), 205-248.

Cooper, G. (2001). Must there be a balance of nature? Biology and Philosophy, 16(4), 481-506.

Cooper, W. S. (1926). The fundamentals of vegetational change. Ecology, 7(4), 391-413.

Cuddington, K. (2001). The “Balance of Nature” metaphor and equilibrium in population Ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 16(4), 463-479.

Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education. Science & Education, 25(1), 147-164.

Durant, J. R. (1993). What is scientific literacy? In J. R. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe (pp. 129-137). London, England: Science Museum.

Egerton, F. N. (1973). Changing concepts of the balance of nature. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 48(2), 322-350.

Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Gleason, H. A. (1926). The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 53(1), 7-26.

Jelinski, D. E. (2005). There is no mother nature-there is no balance of nature: Culture, ecology and conservation. Human Ecology, 33(2), 276-285.

Jenkins, E. W. (1994). Scientific literacy. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 9, pp. 5345-5350). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667-682.

Kampourakis, K., & Gripiotis, C. (2015). Darwinism in context: An interdisciplinary, highly contextualized course on nature of science. Perspectives in Science, 5, 25-35.

Kampourakis, K., & McComas, W. F. (2010). Charles Darwin and Evolution: Illustrating human aspects of Science. Science & Education, 19(6), 637-654.

Klassen, S. (2010). The relation of story structure to a model of conceptual change in Science learning. Science & Education, 19(3), 305-317.

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on Science Education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on Science Education (pp. 600-620). New York, NY: Routledge.

McComas, W. F. (1997). The discovery & nature of evolution by natural selection: Misconceptions & lessons from the History of Science. The American Biology Teacher, 59(8), 492-500.

McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2), 249-263.

McComas, W. F., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Using the History of Biology, Chemistry, Geology, and Physics to illustrate general aspects of Nature of Science. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 9(1), 47-76.

McIntosh, R., P. (1985). The background of Ecology: Concept and theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Niaz, M. (2009). Critical appraisal of physical science as a human enterprise: Dynamics of scientific progress. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Noddings, N., & Witherell, C. (1991). Epilogue: Themes remembered and foreseen. In C. Witherell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell (pp. 279-280). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.

Raved, L., & Assaraf, O. B. Z. (2011). Attitudes towards Science Learning among 10th‐Grade Students: A qualitative look. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1219-1243.

Summers, R., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2019). An exploration of Illinois students’ attitudes toward science using multivariate multilevel modeling with a cross-sectional sample of responses from grades 5 through 10. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(8), 1106-1134.

Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and Abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307.

Tripto, J., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Amit, M. (2018). Recurring patterns in the development of high school biology students’ system thinking over time. Instructional Science, 46(5), 639-680.

Tsoni, R., Ampatzidis, G., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). Scientific practices and crosscutting concepts in Greek Lyceum Science textbooks: The case of Physics. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 7(1), 97-105.

Westra, R. (2008). Learning and teaching ecosystem behaviour in secondary education. Castricum, Netherlands: Faculteit Betawetenschappen.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.3574

View Counter: Abstract | 644 | times, and PDF | 397 | times



Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras