Developing the students’ autonomy in middle school: an exploratory study of French science teachers’ points of view and the expectations of the school institution

SUZANE EL HAGE, JEAN-MARIE BOILEVIN, DARINE EL HAJJAR

Abstract

We propose an exploratory study comparing the statements of 4 French science teachers to the expectations of the institution regarding the notion of autonomy with the speech of an inspector in science on: (1) what is an autonomous middle school student in science and (2) on the support a teacher can use to develop it. The analytical framework is mainly based on several dimensions of autonomy in science education.  We distinguish between pedagogical autonomy and didactic autonomy and characterize the process of autonomisation a pupil according to different dimensions. The analysis of the 5 interviews involves two scales (mesoscopic and microscopic). The comparative analysis of our corpus reveals major differences between the interviewees in terms of pedagogical autonomy and didactic autonomy.

Keywords

Autonomy, didactics, physics-chemistry teacher, inspector, middle school

Full Text:

PDF

References

Albero, B. (2004). L’autoformation dans les dispositifs de formation ouverte et à distance : instrumenter le développement de l'autonomie dans les apprentissages. In I. Saleh, D. Lepage & S. Bouyahi (Eds.), Les TIC au cœur de l'enseignement supérieur, Actes de la journée d'étude du 12 novembre 2002, Laboratoire Paragraphe, Université Paris VIII (pp. 139-159). Vincennes - St Denis, France: Actes Huit.

Basten, M., Meyer‐Ahrens, I., Fries, S., & Wilde, M. (2014). The effects of autonomy‐supportive vs. controlling guidance on learners' motivational and cognitive achievement in a structured field trip. Science Education, 98(6), 1033-1053.

Beizhuizen, J., & Steffens, K. (2011). A conceptual framework for research on self-regulated learning. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens & J. Underwood (Eds.), Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments (pp. 3-20). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Berger, J.-L. (2016). Les croyances des enseignants sur la gestion de la classe et la promotion des engagements des élèves : Articulations aux pratiques enseignantes et évolution par la formation pédagogique. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 196, 129-154.

Black, A., & Deci, E.-L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.

Boilevin, J.-M. (2013). Rénovation de l’enseignement des sciences physiques et formation des enseignants. Regards didactiques. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Boilevin, J.-M., El Hage, S., Joffredo-Lebrun, S., & Gueudet, G. (2021). Développement de l'autonomie des élèves au collège. Points de vue d'enseignants de sciences physiques et de mathématiques. In Acte du 11ème rencontre scientifique de l’Association de Recherche en Didactiques, Sciences et Technologies (pp. 195-202). Belgique: Bruxelles.

Candy, P. (1989). Constructivism and the study of self-direction in adult learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 21, 95-116.

Chevallard, Y. (1991). La transposition didactique. Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.

Chirkov, V.-I. (2009). A cross-cultural analysis of autonomy in education. A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 253-262.

Deci, E.-L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

De Loof, H., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Teachers’ motivating style and students’ motivation and engagement in STEM: The relationship between three key educational concepts. Research in Science Education, 51, 109-127.

El Hage, S., & Boilevin, J.-M. (submitted). Développer l’autonomie des élèves au collège. Points de vue d’enseignants de physique-chimie. Éducation et Didactique.

El Hage, S., & Maigret, M. (2022). Autonomie en physique-chimie : Point de vue d’un représentant de l’institution. Un pas vers l’étude des éventuels décalages entre les attentes de l’institution et les pratiques enseignantes. Bulletin de l’Union des Professeurs de Physique et de Chimie. (In press).

Eneau, J. (2008). From autonomy to reciprocity, or vice versa? French personalism’s contribution to a new perspective on self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 58, 229-248.

Furtak, E.-M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284-316.

Großmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2020). Promoting interest by supporting learner autonomy: The effects of teaching behaviour in Biology lessons. Research in Science Education, 50, 1763-1788.

Gueudet, G., & Joffredo-Lebrun, S. (2021). Teacher education, students’ autonomy and digital technologies: A case study about programming with Scratch. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 15(1), 5-24.

Gueudet, G., & Lebaud, M.-P. (2019). Développer l’autonomie des élèves en mathématiques grâce au numérique partie 2. Analyser le potentiel de ressources pour les professeurs. Petit x, 110/111, 85-102.

Guo, Y. (2019). Autonomisation des apprenants chinois de FLE : Analyse des interventions tutorales dans un dispositif de formation à distance. Didactiques, 8, 10-30.

Hofferber, N. Basten, M., Großmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2016). The effects of autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching behaviour in biology lessons with primary and secondary experiences on students’ intrinsic motivation and flow-experience. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2114-2132.

IDEE Glossary. (2018) Autonomie : définition. Glossaire des notions et concepts https://www.interactik.fr/portail/web/se-documenter/projet-idee-glossaire-des-notions-et-concepts.

Le Bouil, A., Eneau, J., & Boilevin, J.-M. (2021). Effets d’un dispositif de formation de professeurs stagiaires en physique-chimie pour développer l’autonomie des élèves, Recherches en Didactique des Sciences et des Technologies, 23. (Accepted).

Le Bouil, A., El Hage, S., Jameau, A., & Boilevin, J.-M. (2019). L’autonomie des élèves dans l’apprentissage de la physique-chimie selon les enseignants. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 6(1), 274-280.

Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29.

MENESR (Ministère de l’éducation nationale, de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche). (2020). BOEN n° 31 du 30 juillet 2020. Retrieved from https://cache.media.eduscol. education.fr/file/AScolarite_obligatoire/37/7/Programme2020_cycle_4_comparatif_1313377.pdf.

Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 110-128). Kiel: IPN.

Niemiec, C.-P., & Ryan, R.-M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144.

Patall, E. A., & Zambrano, J. (2019). Facilitating student outcomes by supporting autonomy: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(2), 115-122.

Quintin, J.-J. (2013). L'autonomie en question (s). Les langues modernes, 4, 17-29.

Ramnarain, U. (2010). Grade 9 science teachers’ and learners’ appreciation of the benefits of autonomous science investigations. Education as Change, 14(2), 187-200.

Ramnarain, U., & Hobden, P. (2015). Shifting South African learners towards greater autonomy in scientific investigations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(1), 94-121.

Reeve, J.-M., & Halusic, M. (2009). How K-12 teachers can put self-determination theory principles into practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 145-154.

Robert, A. (2012). A didactical framework for studying students’ and teachers’ activities when learning and teaching Mathematics. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 19(4), 153-158.

Robertson, L., & Gail Jones, M. (2013). Chinese and US middle-school science teachers' autonomy, motivation, and instructional practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1454-1489.

Ryan, R.-M., & Deci, E.-L. (2017). Self-determination theory. In basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.

Tiberghien, A. (2012). Analyse d’une séance de physique en seconde : Quelle continuité dans les pratiques. Éducation & Didactique, 6(3), 97-123.

Wang, Y., & Tsai, C. (2020). An investigation of Taiwanese high school students’ basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration in Science learning contexts in relation to their Science learning self-efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 43-59.

Wood, M. (2016). Rituals and right answers: barriers and supports to autonomous activity. Education Studies in Mathematics, 91, 327-348.

Zhang, D., Bobis, J., Wu, X., & Cui. Y. (2020). The effects of an autonomy-supportive teaching intervention on Chinese Physics students and their teacher. Research in Science Education, 50, 645-671.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.3826

View Counter: Abstract | 524 | times, and PDF | 199 | times



Re S M ICT E | ISSN: 1792-3999 (electronic), 1791-261X (print) | Laboratory of Didactics of Sciences, Mathematics and ICT, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education - University of Patras.

Pasithee | Library & Information Center | University of Patras